Re: [PATCH 1/1] tools: fix cross-compile var export

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:24:42AM -0800, Martin Kelly wrote:
> On 01/08/2018 03:39 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 12:17:40PM -0800, Martin Kelly wrote:
> > > On 12/23/2017 02:16 PM, Martin Kelly wrote:
> > > > On 12/23/2017 01:06 PM, Martin Kelly wrote:
> > > > > From: Martin Kelly <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Currently in a number of Makefiles, we clobber the CC, LD, and/or
> > > > > STRIP env vars
> > > > > when cross-compiling, which breaks any additional flags that might
> > > > > be set (such
> > > > > as sysroot). This easily shows up by using, for instance, a Yocto SDK.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fix this by more carefully overriding the flags in the way that the perf
> > > > > Makefile does.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This patch does not fix cross-compile for all the tools (some have
> > > > > other bugs),
> > > > > but it does appear to fix it for these:
> > > > > 
> > > > > - cgroup
> > > > > - freefall
> > > > > - gpio
> > > > > - hv
> > > > > - iio
> > > > > - leds
> > > > > - spi
> > > > > - vm
> > > > > - wmi
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kelly <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >    tools/cgroup/Makefile            |  1 -
> > > > >    tools/gpio/Makefile              |  2 --
> > > > >    tools/hv/Makefile                |  1 -
> > > > >    tools/iio/Makefile               |  2 --
> > > > >    tools/laptop/freefall/Makefile   |  1 -
> > > > >    tools/leds/Makefile              |  1 -
> > > > >    tools/perf/Makefile.perf         |  6 ------
> > > > >    tools/power/acpi/Makefile.config |  3 ---
> > > > >    tools/scripts/Makefile.include   | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >    tools/spi/Makefile               |  2 --
> > > > >    tools/usb/Makefile               |  1 -
> > > > >    tools/vm/Makefile                |  1 -
> > > > >    tools/wmi/Makefile               |  1 -
> > > > >    13 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > 
> > Hi Martin,
> > 
> > This stuff needs to be broken up into one patch per directory and sent
> > to the individual maintainers.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, a lot of people haven't filled out MAINTAINERS properly
> > for their tools/ directory so get_maintainer.pl doesn't always select
> > the correct mailing list.  Keeping track of the tools/ director is
> > actually a good task for kernel-janitors btw.
> > 
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> I'm very confused at this point, as I am hearing different things from
> different people. This patch is a bit unique in that it spans multiple
> subsystems but is a single, logical bugfix (see
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151534992512934&w=2 for details). This
> means that to follow the one-patch-per-logical change rule, I have to break
> the patch-for-subsystem-X-goes-to-maintainer-of-subsystem-X rule, and vice
> versa.
> 
> Given that this is a single logical change, Paul Gortmaker suggested that I
> CC each maintainer and try to get Andrew Morton to pick it up:
> 

That's actually a good idea.  Do it that way.

regards,
dan carpenter


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux