>> Is the function "seq_puts" a bit more efficient for the desired output >> of a single string in comparison to calling the function "seq_printf" >> for this purpose? > > Will you please be so kind and tell us? How do you think about to get the run time characteristics for these sequence output functions better documented? https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.15-rc6/source/fs/seq_file.c#L660 Can an information like “WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf” (from the script “checkpatch.pl”) be another incentive? >>> and "strings should be quickly put into a sequence" >>> isn't terribly helpful. >> >> Which wording would you find more appropriate for the suggested >> adjustment of these function calls? > > Whatever describes the actual issue and what you're doing about it. > Turn your rhetorical question above into a commit message, done. > > Compare that with your original commit message, on the other hand, > and you should understand what I mean. Which descriptions are you really missing for the affected data output? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
