Re: [0/4] video-UDLFB: Adjustments for five function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> * Do you find a Linux allocation failure report insufficient in this use case?
> 
> Yes,

Interesting …


> there is more information available currently in the driver and
> I see no real improvement in removing it.
> 
>> * Are you looking for any more clarification?
> 
> I will not apply any of such patches for now. The only exception
> being drivers that support hardware that can have only one instance
> in the system …

Thanks for your feedback.


> and the patch needs to be reviewed by a someone else than the author).

I am curious if this will ever happen again for my update suggestions
in such a software area.

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux