From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The function safexcel_try_push_requests is local to the source and does
not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
Cleans up sparse warning:
symbol 'safexcel_try_push_requests' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
index 0d685be75241..e3745139644b 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c
@@ -432,8 +432,8 @@ static int safexcel_hw_init(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv)
}
/* Called with ring's lock taken */
-int safexcel_try_push_requests(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv, int ring,
- int reqs)
+static int safexcel_try_push_requests(struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv,
+ int ring, int reqs)
{
int coal = min_t(int, reqs, EIP197_MAX_BATCH_SZ);
--
2.14.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
