Hi, On 15/12/2017 at 19:00, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:55:11 +0100 > > Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function. > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Can you point which coccinelle script highlited this issue? > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c > index acd3ce8ecf3f..4fb1be246c44 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c > @@ -401,7 +401,6 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > tcbpwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*tcbpwm), GFP_KERNEL); > if (tcbpwm == NULL) { > err = -ENOMEM; > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate memory\n"); We have this in case of error: atmel-tcb-pwm pwm: failed to allocate memory atmel-tcb-pwm: probe of pwm failed with error -12 Which is somehow redundant I admit... > goto err_free_tc; > } > > -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html