Hi, On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 09:47:34PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> I am still waiting for possibilities to improve also the corresponding > >> reference documentation somehow as you know it already. > > > > If you require someone else to update the documentation to be able to > > explain why the patch is useful, > > My approach is to refer to the Linux allocation failure report. > > > > then it would seem that you do not know why the patch is useful, > > and thus should not submit it. > > We tried to clarify other explanation approaches a few times. > > But it seems that we are stuck with specific software aspects. > How would you like to see remaining open issues to be resolved > there anyhow? FYI: I will drop this and (without any further notice) all future patches from you, that do no follow the documented process in Documentation/process/. -- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
