On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Maybe the good thing to do is to actaully leave the nuc900 code alone > instead of trying to change something that never failed and that doesn't > seem to interest anyone anymore (else the platform would have been > converted to DT). Yes, this definitely seems like far more trouble than it's worth.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
