> Hi Markus, I've accepted the ones that I think made an improvement > outweighing the inherent small costs of making any change. Does such a kind of feedback mean that you reconsidered any places where you expressed a rejection initially? > We also need to avoid code constructs that are unusual in error handling > such as backwards gotos. Why would you like to exclude this approach if anything useful could be achieved in the shown software design direction? > Note however that most of the changes made so far are only minor improvements. I agree that corresponding effects are small just because the discussed source code adjustments affected specific function implementations. > I am not saying I don't appreciate them, Thanks. > but rather than that they are of of low importance. A lot of details are competing also for our software development attention. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
