From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Functions nsim_bpf_create_prog and nsim_bpf_destroy_prog are local to the
source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
Cleans up sparse warnings:
symbol 'nsim_bpf_create_prog' was not declared. Should it be static?
symbol 'nsim_bpf_destroy_prog' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c
index 8e4398a50903..078d2c37a6c1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int nsim_xdp_set_prog(struct netdevsim *ns, struct netdev_bpf *bpf)
return 0;
}
-int nsim_bpf_create_prog(struct netdevsim *ns, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+static int nsim_bpf_create_prog(struct netdevsim *ns, struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
struct nsim_bpf_bound_prog *state;
char name[16];
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ int nsim_bpf_create_prog(struct netdevsim *ns, struct bpf_prog *prog)
return 0;
}
-void nsim_bpf_destroy_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+static void nsim_bpf_destroy_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
struct nsim_bpf_bound_prog *state;
--
2.14.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
