On Sun, 2017-11-26 at 23:44 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > My semantic patch and results are below. The semantic patch has some > features that may or may not be desired: > > 1. It goes beyond printk, pr_xxx, dev_xxx, and netdev_xxx, by finding > functions that are sometimes used with a format string ending with a > newline. To reduce false positives, such a function is ignored if it is > sometimes used with a string that ends in a space. This could lead to > false positives where actually one of the calls has a \n that it should > not have. > > 2. Coccinelle puts multipart strings on a single line. So the rule goes > a little further and eliminates the multipartness. Basically "xxx " "yyy" > becomes "xxx yyy" regardless of the length of the result. What about the semi-common string concatenation "foo" #var "bar" ? > 3. Some prints appear not to end with a newline because they end with \n. > where .\n was likely intended. Instead of creating \n.\n, the semantic > patch just moves the .to the left of the . And if there was .\n. it just > drops the final period. That may be a problem if the sentence is "something...\n" There seem to be many false positives in here too. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
