Re: [PATCH 0/7] ALSA: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:02:34 +0100
> 
> Some update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (7):
>   seq: Delete unnecessary checks in snd_seq_ioctl_query_subs()
>   seq: Delete unnecessary checks in snd_seq_ioctl_get_subscription()
>   seq: Delete unnecessary checks in snd_seq_ioctl_unsubscribe_port()
>   seq: Delete unnecessary checks in snd_seq_ioctl_subscribe_port()
>   seq: Adjust 16 function calls together with a variable assignment
>   dmasound_core: Move two assignments for the variable "ret" in state_open()
>   dmasound_core: Adjust six function calls together with a variable assignment
> 
>  sound/core/seq/seq_clientmgr.c     | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  sound/oss/dmasound/dmasound_core.c |  33 +++++---
>  2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)

Are these update suggestions worth for another look?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/24/292

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux