Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > We're allocating the size of the struct which is 32 bytes when we should > be allocating sizeof(void *) which is 4 or 8 bytes depending on the > architecture. > > Fixes: 885dcd709ba9 ("powerpc/perf: Add nest IMC PMU support") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. I think your patch is right, but the code would be much simpler if we actually did just allocate an array of struct imc_events, rather than an array of pointers to structs. Some of the cleanup code is written as if that is already the case, ie. it frees the pmu->events array, but not the things the array points to. So there's a memory leak there too. Anju, Maddy, can one of you rework the code to just use an array of structs? Basically imc_parse_event() wouldn't allocate a struct, we would pass it a pointer to a slot in the array. cheers > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c > index 88126245881b..91c90ddab807 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int update_events_in_group(struct device_node *node, struct imc_pmu *pmu) > of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &base_reg); > > /* Allocate memory for the events */ > - pmu->events = kcalloc(ct, sizeof(struct imc_events), GFP_KERNEL); > + pmu->events = kcalloc(ct, sizeof(*pmu->events), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!pmu->events) > return -ENOMEM; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html