Re: Adjustments for a lot of function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/30/2017 11:40 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>>>> Feel free to repost, but only if you organize the patch as either fixing the same type of
>>>>> issue for a whole subdirectory (media/usb, media/pci, etc)
>>>
>>> Just for the record, while this may work for media, it won't work for all
>>> subsystems.  One will quickly get a complaint that the big patch needs to
>>> go into multiple trees.
>>
>> For the record: this only applies to drivers/media.
> 
> Interesting …
> 
> 
>> We discussed what do to with series like this during our media summit last Friday
> 
> Would you like to share any more information from this meeting?

??? I did that: either one patch per directory with the same type of change,
or one patch per driver combining all the changes for that driver.

> 
> 
>> and this was the conclusion of that.
> 
> I would appreciate further indications for a corresponding change acceptance.
> 
> I found a feedback by Mauro Carvalho Chehab more constructive.
> 
> [GIT,PULL,FOR,v4.15] Cleanup fixes
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/43957/
> 
> “…
> This time, I was nice and I took some time doing:
> 
> 	$ quilt fold < `quilt next` && quilt delete `quilt next`
> …”

Yes, and you were told not to do it like that again.

Regards,

	Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux