On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:36:09 +0200
SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> @@ -683,13 +683,10 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev
> >> *vio_dev, reg_crq_cleanup:
> >> dma_unmap_single(dev, ibmvtpm->crq_dma_handle,
> >> CRQ_RES_BUF_SIZE, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> >> -cleanup:
> >> - if (ibmvtpm) {
> >> - if (crq_q->crq_addr)
> >> - free_page((unsigned long)crq_q->crq_addr);
> >> - kfree(ibmvtpm);
> >> - }
> >> -
> >
> > I think a single cleanup section is better than many labels that
> > just avoid a single null check.
>
> I proposed to delete two unnecessary condition checks together with
> an adjustment of jump targets.
>
They are necessary to ensure the code works with single jump target.
The compiler is free to optimize them away and create the new jump
target implicitly. Do not do the optimization in place of the compiler.
It can do it automatically, in most cases better, and automatically
adapt it to code changes.
Thanks
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
