On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 01:11:29PM +0200, Paolo Cretaro wrote: > Hi Dan, > just minor nitpicking on the commit message: > > On 08/09/2017 12:53, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > The background of this code is that we can either use the default > > tables or load our own table with sysfs. The default tables are three > > element arrays of struct tsl2x7x_lux. If we load the table with sysfs > > then we can have as many as nine elements. Which ever way we do it, the > > last element is always zeroed out. > > > > The most interesting part of this patch is in the > > in_illuminance0_lux_table_show() function. We were using the wrong > > limit, "TSL2X7X_MAX_LUX_TABLE_SIZE * 3", when it should have been just > > "TSL2X7X_MAX_LUX_TABLE_SIZE". This creates a static checker warning > > that we are going of of bounds. However, since the last element is > out of bounds > > Regards, > P. > > > always zeroed out, that means we hit the break statement and the code > > works correctly despite the wrong limit check. What? No no. I meant it how I wrote it. The last element is always zeroed out meaning it's just a series of zeroes. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
