On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:37:16 +0200,
Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:23:14PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > Ah, wait, now I see your point. It was introduced by the very recent
> > patch through Mark's asoc tree (since it was wrongly labeled as "ASoC"
> > while it isn't). That patch looks indeed fishy. The change in
> > atmel_ac97c_resume() is also bad.
>
> The resume check looks fine? The function appears to do nothing other
> than the clk_prepare_enable().
Well, the patch behaves correctly but the code is ugly:
int ret = clk_prepare_enable(chip->pclk);
return ret;
> > So, I'd prefer reverting the wrong commit instead, and leave some
> > comment about the uselessness of clk_prepare_enable() return value
> > check.
>
> I'd rather keep the error checking there, it means that people don't
> need to open the code and verify it when they go scanning for potential
> problems.
OK.
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
