On 8/27/17 3:26 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 21:18:37 +0200
>
> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Did coccinelle trip on the message or the fact you weren't returning NULL?
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/connector/cn_queue.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_queue.c b/drivers/connector/cn_queue.c
> index 1f8bf054d11c..e4f31d679f02 100644
> --- a/drivers/connector/cn_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/connector/cn_queue.c
> @@ -40,10 +40,8 @@ cn_queue_alloc_callback_entry(struct cn_queue_dev *dev, const char *name,
> struct cn_callback_entry *cbq;
>
> cbq = kzalloc(sizeof(*cbq), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!cbq) {
> - pr_err("Failed to create new callback queue.\n");
> + if (!cbq)
> return NULL;
> - }
Wny not:
if (!cbq) {
pr_err("Failed to create new callback queue.\n");
+ return NULL;
}
>
> atomic_set(&cbq->refcnt, 1);
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
