On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:55:10PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This is just cleanups and doesn't change the behavior.
You can't return from in the middle of the loop just because the
allocation fails.
> The static checker is still going to complain about the error pointer
> from the loop.
Please drop this argument about the static checker which you write. I'm
certainly not changing code just because some tool complains.
> Perhaps we should only set prev_found if the memdup_patch()
> inside the loop succeeds?
This not why we set prev_found.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
