Re: [PATCH][drm-next] drm/amdgpu: remove duplicate return statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I must have added that accidentally when cherry-picking an internal
patch for upstreaming. Thanks for catching it.

Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>

Regards,
  Felix


On 2017-08-23 09:17 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Remove a redundant identical return statement, it has no use.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1454586 ("Structurally dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c
> index fb6e5dbd5a03..309f2419c6d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c
> @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ static const struct kfd2kgd_calls kfd2kgd = {
>  struct kfd2kgd_calls *amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_8_0_get_functions(void)
>  {
>  	return (struct kfd2kgd_calls *)&kfd2kgd;
> -	return (struct kfd2kgd_calls *)&kfd2kgd;
>  }
>  
>  static inline struct amdgpu_device *get_amdgpu_device(struct kgd_dev *kgd)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux