On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:00:33AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 10:24 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data() can return error pointers so we should
> > check for that. There is no need to check "data->ti_thermal" for
> > NULL
> > and we removed that from the other cleanup function so we may as well
> > from it in ti_thermal_remove_sensor() to be consistent.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> > b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> > index c211a8e4a210..9fea354ca90c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c
> > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ int ti_thermal_remove_sensor(struct ti_bandgap
> > *bgp, int id)
> >
> > data = ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(bgp, id);
> >
> > - if (data && data->ti_thermal) {
> > + if (data && !IS_ERR(data)) {
>
> what about
> if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data))
>
Duh. Of course, let me resend.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
