On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 11:28:16AM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote: > I was using the same subject start as the patch that introduced the > memory leak and touched the same portion of code. I can resend if necessary. I think having the hns prefix makes it clearer, as the patch doesn't touch IB core code but hns code. The reference to the patch which introduced the leak is given byu the fixes line. Thanks, Johannes -- Johannes Thumshirn Storage jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
