>>> I didn't consider one would be triggered by the kzalloc failure. >> >> Do you reconsider any special system settings for further >> software evolution then? > > Sorry, I don't quite understand your question. Do you try to configure the Linux error reporting to any special needs? > I think your original patch is OK, How does this feedback fit to the initial response “Not Applicable”? https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/798575/ > and I would appreciate if you added a check for failure of ps3vram_cache_init() > in ps3vram_probe(). I unsure if this adjustment will need more software updates. > If you decide not to add that check I'll create a patch for it later. I am curious on who will pick this update candidate up as the next improvement. Have you got any preferences for the exception handling there? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
