On 08/03/2017 12:17 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 20:34:00 +0200 > > The local variable "rc" will eventually be set only to an error code. > Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c > index 93cc902350db..5677f3371e30 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/axonram.c > @@ -184,7 +184,6 @@ static int axon_ram_probe(struct platform_device *device) > static int axon_ram_bank_id = -1; > struct axon_ram_bank *bank; > struct resource resource; > - int rc = 0; You've completely removed the decleration of "rc" instead of removing the "= 0" initialization. I would expect a compilation test to have turned up an undeclared use error for "rc". -Tyrel > > axon_ram_bank_id++; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
