Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: remove some macros, introduce some inline functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:07:37PM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> I get your point and I understand, that there need to be rules to
> simplify the life for the maintainers...
> 
> But I honestly must confess, that at the moment, I don't have the
> time for doing that. I am into two customer projects, that keep me
> very busy these weeks.
> 
> The only thing, I can offer, is to remove all the lines, dealing 
> with the #ifdef DEBUG and leave the rest, as it is and send it again.
> Then all other changes are related to the move from macro to inline...
> If that helps, please let me know.
> 
> If it needs further fragmentation, it'll take something like half 
> a day / a day. I most probably can spent that day end of August, 
> begin of September the earliest.
> 

One trick that might help is you can just use `git citool` and highlight
all the rmw() lines, add selected lines to the commit, then commit that
as one patch.  Repeat for all five patches.

The kernel process does kind of have a steep learning with redoing
patches...  Sorry about that.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux