[PATCH 2/2 v2] leds: tlc591xx: add missing of_node_put

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



for_each_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration, so a
return from the loop requires an of_node_put.

The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):

// <smpl>
@@
local idexpression n;
expression e,e1;
iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
@@

 for_each_child_of_node(e1,n) {
   ...
(
   of_node_put(n);
|
   e = n
|
   return n;
|
+  of_node_put(n);
?  return ...;
)
   ...
 }
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c
index fcc87ee..f5357f6 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-tlc591xx.c
@@ -230,11 +230,15 @@ struct tlc591xx {
 
 	for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
 		err = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &reg);
-		if (err)
+		if (err) {
+			of_node_put(child);
 			return err;
+		}
 		if (reg < 0 || reg >= tlc591xx->max_leds ||
-		    priv->leds[reg].active)
+		    priv->leds[reg].active) {
+			of_node_put(child);
 			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 		priv->leds[reg].active = true;
 		priv->leds[reg].ldev.name =
 			of_get_property(child, "label", NULL) ? : child->name;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux