From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> The pointer intel_ucode_patch does not need to be in global scope, so make it static. Cleans up sparse warning: "symbol 'intel_ucode_patch' was not declared. Should it be static?" Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c index d525a0bd7d28..59edbe9d4ccb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static const char ucode_path[] = "kernel/x86/microcode/GenuineIntel.bin"; /* Current microcode patch used in early patching on the APs. */ -struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch; +static struct microcode_intel *intel_ucode_patch; static inline bool cpu_signatures_match(unsigned int s1, unsigned int p1, unsigned int s2, unsigned int p2) -- 2.11.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
