Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH][drm-next] drm/i915/cnl: make function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:03:05PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 13/06/2017 14:47, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The function cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state does not need to be in global
> > scope, so make it static.
> > 
> > Cleans up sparse warning:
> > "symbol 'cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state' was not declared. Should it
> >   be static?"
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 5 +++--
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > index 8e669b6254ae..2f7b0e64f628 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > @@ -2292,8 +2292,9 @@ static bool cnl_ddi_hdmi_pll_dividers(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >   	return true;
> >   }
> >   
> > -bool cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > -				  struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> > +static bool
> > +cnl_ddi_dp_set_dpll_hw_state(int clock,
> > +			     struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> >   {
> >   	uint32_t cfgcr0;
> >   
> > 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the patch and review. Pushed to dinq.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux