Yeah, I saw this earlier. I'm on the amd-gfx list. The patch looks good to me. Feel free to add my R-b. Do you want to apply it to amd-staging-4.11 and drm-next? I can take care of amd-kfd-staging and the release branches. Thanks, Felix On 17-06-14 12:41 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 6:59 AM > > To: Oded Gabbay; Alexey Skidanov > > Cc: Deucher, Alexander; Koenig, Christian; David Airlie; dri- > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel- > > janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: NULL dereference involving create_process() > > > > We accidentally return ERR_PTR(0) which is NULL. The caller is not > > expecting that and it leads to an Oops. > > > > Fixes: dd59239a9862 ("amdkfd: init aperture once per process") > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Include Felix. > > Alex > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c > > index 84d1ffd1eef9..1190d06884ed 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c > > @@ -318,7 +318,8 @@ static struct kfd_process *create_process(const > struct > > task_struct *thread) > > > > /* init process apertures*/ > > process->is_32bit_user_mode = in_compat_syscall(); > > - if (kfd_init_apertures(process) != 0) > > + err = kfd_init_apertures(process); > > + if (err != 0) > > goto err_init_apretures; > > > > return process; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
