Re: [PATCH RESEND] Eliminate extra 'out_free' label from fcoe_init function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 03:01:29PM +0200, walter harms wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 02.06.2017 14:39, schrieb Milan P. Gandhi:
> > Simplify the check for return code of fcoe_if_init routine
> > in fcoe_init function such that we could eliminate need for
> > extra 'out_free' label and duplicate mutex_unlock statement.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Milan P. Gandhi <mgandhi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 7 +++----
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
> > index ea21e7b..a2cf3d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
> > @@ -2523,14 +2523,13 @@ static int __init fcoe_init(void)
> >  	fcoe_dev_setup();
> >  
> >  	rc = fcoe_if_init();
> > +	mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
> > +
> >  	if (rc)
> > -		goto out_free;
> > +		goto out_destroy;
> >  
> > -	mutex_unlock(&fcoe_config_mutex);
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> if you do that, why not
> if (!rc) return 0;

Gar...  No.  Please don't get creative with the last if statement.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux