>> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
>> @@ -1447,5 +1447,4 @@ static __init int sctp_init(void)
>> if (!sctp_ep_hashtable) {
>> - pr_err("Failed endpoint_hash alloc\n");
>
> Okay but then why not also delete the one a few lines below this one:
> if (!sctp_port_hashtable) {
> pr_err("Failed bind hash alloc\n");
> status = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_bhash_alloc;
> }
> Seems the same pattern to me.
>
>> status = -ENOMEM;
>> goto err_ehash_alloc;
>> }
How do you think about to remove the other error message in another
update step if a consensus would be achieved in such a direction
for this software module?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
