Re: [PATCH 0/3] GPU-DRM-Radeon: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 10.05.2017 um 02:23 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 03/05/17 09:46 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 02.05.2017 um 22:04 schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 22:00:02 +0200

Three update suggestions were taken into account
from static source code analysis.

Markus Elfring (3):
    Use seq_putc() in radeon_sa_bo_dump_debug_info()
    Use seq_puts() in radeon_debugfs_pm_info()
    Use seq_puts() in r100_debugfs_cp_csq_fifo()
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Based on
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2017-May/140837.html
and followups, I'm afraid we'll have to make sure Markus' patches have
been tested adequately before applying them.

I can't judge the background of that decision, but at least those tree patches for radeon looked trivial to me.

I don't see much what could go wrong when merging them. On the other hand you are right that trying to find hardware to test that stuff could be challenging.

Christian.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux