On Thu, 04 May 2017, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:54:16PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 13:20:47 +0200 >> >> Some strings which did not contain data format specifications should be put >> into a sequence. Thus use the corresponding function "seq_puts". > > debugfs / seq_file is not performance critical. Familiar idiomatic code is > much preferred over continually switching between seq_printf and seq_puts. > > And don't even start on converting seq_printf / seq_puts to seq_putc... Agreed. I don't want any of the seq_* changes in this series. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
