On 04/29/2017 11:28 AM, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Hi everyone > > 16.03.2017, 18:20, "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@xxxxxx>: >> Like other subsystems we should be able to define slave devices outside >> of the w1 directory. To do this we move public facing interface >> definitions to include/linux/w1.h and rename the internal definition >> file to w1_internal.h. >> >> As w1_family.h and w1_int.h contained almost entirely public >> driver interface definitions we simply removed these files and >> moved the remaining definitions into w1_internal.h. > > w1_int.h was a shortname for w1_internal.h actually > >> With this we can now start to move slave devices out of w1/slaves and >> into the subsystem based on the function they implement, again like >> other drivers. > > I'm not against this patch per-se, I especially like linux/w1 include instead of ../w1.h, > quite curious why didn't I move include file into linux directory in the first place, > but please elaborate why is this needed? > I'm moving the bq27xxx driver out of w1 and into power/supply where it should be, see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/16/688 > Also I do not agree with TI copyright in the new inclusion file which is merely a movement of the old file. > There is more going on that just moving the file, this was a lot of re-work, also I kept your copyright, is it a problem to add another? If so I'm fine with that too and can remove it. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
