On 2017-04-25 13:30, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:00:05 +0200 The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following. WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful Thus remove such a statement here. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c index 5216e33e61a3..9018f26a5667 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c @@ -4966,7 +4966,6 @@ static void ufshcd_exception_event_handler(struct work_struct *work) out: pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev); - return; } /* Complete requests that have door-bell cleared */
Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
