Re: IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Patches should either be useful to users of the Linux kernel, e.g. by adding
> new functionality or by fixing a bug, or to kernel developers, e.g. by making
> their workflow easier.

Such an expectation is generally fine.


> I don't think this patch series falls in either category

I find that my update suggestion touches some aspects for the desired
source code quality, doesn't it?


> so please drop these patches.

I hope that corresponding software improvements will be clarified further.

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux