Re: [PATCH 00/29] IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 23:02 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > 
> > I've dropped this entire series.  If you want me to consider it,
> > you
> > need to respin it with the following changes:
> 
> How do you think about to integrate any of my update suggestions
> which you do not find controversial (or questionable) at the moment?

No.  Far too many of your patches need commit messages fixes and the
like.  If you want me to include them, then follow all of the
requirements I gave you.

> 
> > 
> > 1) Put all similar corrections in a single patch.
> 
> I preferred an other patch granularity so far.

Not to be too blunt about it, but your preference is not the one that
matters in this situation.  If you want me to consider the patches,
then you need to respin them following the directions I gave.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
    GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
   
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux