On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:54:40PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> @@ -7324,8 +7324,9 @@ struct qib_devdata *qib_init_iba7322_funcs(struct pci_dev *pdev, > >> actual_cnt -= dd->num_pports; > >> > >> tabsize = actual_cnt; > >> - dd->cspec->msix_entries = kzalloc(tabsize * > >> - sizeof(struct qib_msix_entry), GFP_KERNEL); > >> + dd->cspec->msix_entries = kcalloc(tabsize, > >> + sizeof(*dd->cspec->msix_entries), > >> + GFP_KERNEL); > > > > Are we fine with loosing the zeroing of the entries? > > How did you get this concern? > > Do you really miss such functionality from the other interface? Ahm... Don't kzalloc() and kcalloc() both pass in __GFP_ZERO? -- Johannes Thumshirn Storage jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
