From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:23:41 +0200 The error code "-ENOMEM" was also returned so far when the parameter "s" of this function contained a null pointer. Now I find that the code "-EINVAL" is more appropriate in this case. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- security/selinux/ss/sidtab.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/sidtab.c b/security/selinux/ss/sidtab.c index c5f436b15d19..2eb2a54b88d2 100644 --- a/security/selinux/ss/sidtab.c +++ b/security/selinux/ss/sidtab.c @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ int sidtab_insert(struct sidtab *s, u32 sid, struct context *context) struct sidtab_node *prev, *cur, *newnode; if (!s) - return -ENOMEM; + return -EINVAL; hvalue = SIDTAB_HASH(sid); prev = NULL; -- 2.12.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
