Re: [PATCH] [media] coda: remove redundant call to v4l2_m2m_get_vq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/03/17 12:57, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The call to v4ls_m2m_get_vq is only used to get the return value
> which is not being used, so it appears to be redundant and can
> be removed.
> 
> Detected with CoverityScan, CID#1420674 ("Useless call")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/coda/coda-common.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda-common.c b/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda-common.c
> index 800d2477f1a0..95e4648f18e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/coda/coda-common.c
> @@ -817,8 +817,6 @@ static int coda_qbuf(struct file *file, void *priv,
>  static bool coda_buf_is_end_of_stream(struct coda_ctx *ctx,
>  				      struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *buf)
>  {
> -	v4l2_m2m_get_vq(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx, V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT);
> -
>  	return ((ctx->bit_stream_param & CODA_BIT_STREAM_END_FLAG) &&
>  		(buf->sequence == (ctx->qsequence - 1)));
>  }
> 

Philipp, is this correct, or should this actually check whether the queue is an
output queue?

Regards,

	Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux