Em Mon, 26 Dec 2016 21:45:50 +0100 SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 19:19:49 +0100 > > The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following. > > WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message > > Thus fix the affected source code place. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c > index 277183f2d514..812d0b2a2f73 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c > @@ -203,11 +203,6 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier) > return; > > dev = kmalloc_array(n_subdev, sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!dev) { > - dev_err(notifier->v4l2_dev->dev, > - "Failed to allocate device cache!\n"); > - } > - In this specific case, we should keep it, as the message means that the unregister logic won't work properly, as this loop won't run: /* * Call device_attach() to reprobe devices * * NOTE: If dev allocation fails, i is 0, and the whole loop won't be * executed. */ while (i--) { struct device *d = dev[i]; if (d && device_attach(d) < 0) { const char *name = "(none)"; int lock = device_trylock(d); if (lock && d->driver) name = d->driver->name; dev_err(d, "Failed to re-probe to %s\n", name); if (lock) device_unlock(d); } put_device(d); } So, IMHO, the proper patch would be to change the message to be more comprehensive, describing the consequences of not being able to allocate the dev cache. > mutex_lock(&list_lock); > > list_del(¬ifier->list); Thanks, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html