On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > >> > could wrap. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. > > > > I could process these patches, if that would help, > > Thanks for the offer. > I don't think there will be conflicts with all the work happening in net-next, > but it's best to avoid even possibility of it when we can. > Dan, > can you please resend the patch cc-ing Dave and netdev ? > please mention [PATCH net-next] in the subject. > Sure. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
