Re: [PATCH 0/3] AVR32: Fine-tuning for two function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Around Wed 18 Jan 2017 14:45:07 +0100 or thereabout, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:40:04 +0100
> 
> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (3):
>   Return directly after a failed access_ok() in setup_rt_frame()
>   Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in setup_rt_frame()
>   Return an error code only as a constant in sys_cacheflush()
> 
>  arch/avr32/kernel/signal.c |  5 ++---
>  arch/avr32/mm/cache.c      | 21 +++++----------------
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Ack, I guess it slightly simplifies reading. Will add to linux-avr32 git
tree.

-- 
mvh
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux