On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:46:22PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:19:24PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:14:38PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > > > From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 21:46:32 +0300 > > > > > > > > > The break statement should be indented one more tab. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Applied, but like Julia I think we might have a missing of_node_put() > > > > here. > > > > > > Of course, sorry for dropping the ball on this. I'll send a patch for > > > that. > > > > > > > Actually, I've looked at it some more and I think this function is OK. > > We're supposed to do an of_node_put() later... I can't find where that > > happens, but presumably that's because I don't know stmmac well. This > > code here, though, is fine. > > Why do you think it is fine? Does anyone in the calling context know > which child would have caused the break? Yeah. It's saved in plat->mdio_node and we expect to be holding on either path through the function. (It would be better if one of the stmmac people were responding here insead of a random fix the indenting weenie like myself.) regards, dan caprenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html