On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 02:24:22PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 00:07 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:54:50PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > diff -u -p drivers//dma/pxa_dma.c /tmp/nothing//dma/pxa_dma.c > > > --- drivers//dma/pxa_dma.c > > > +++ /tmp/nothing//dma/pxa_dma.c > > > @@ -640,9 +640,6 @@ static unsigned int clear_chan_irq(struc > > > dcsr = phy_readl_relaxed(phy, DCSR); > > > phy_writel(phy, dcsr, DCSR); > > > if ((dcsr & PXA_DCSR_BUSERR) && (phy->vchan)) > > > - dev_warn(&phy->vchan->vc.chan.dev->device, > > > - "%s(chan=%p): PXA_DCSR_BUSERR\n", > > > - __func__, &phy->vchan); > > > > That's not a defect. We're getting the address of vchan. I don't get > > it? > > $ git grep -n -w vchan drivers/dma/pxa* > drivers/dma/pxa_dma.c:103: struct pxad_chan *vchan; I'm not sure what you're saying here still. This code works as intended. We're not printing a stack address. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
