Hi Tilman, On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 21:57 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Not much of a mess, I reckon. Everything that has been allocated and > registered up to that point is properly deallocated and unregistered. > The code just fails to tell the kernel that module initialization has > failed, so the module remains loaded even though it can never be > called because it isn't hooked anywhere. That's a nuisance and a > waste of RAM, but not much more. Yes. But then the removal of the module, which is the only reasonable thing to do after all this has happened, seems to trigger a WARN in driver_unregister(). And it's that WARN that I think requires the entire stable song and dance. Otherwise it would be, as far as I can tell, a hard to hit problem in an obscure driver without any side effects. Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
