On Tue, 01 Nov 2016, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > 'i2c_new_dummy()' does not return an error pointer, so the test can be > simplified to be more consistent. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mfd/bcm590xx.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied, thanks. > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/bcm590xx.c b/drivers/mfd/bcm590xx.c > index 0d76d690176b..c572a35a9341 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/bcm590xx.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/bcm590xx.c > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int bcm590xx_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c_pri, > /* Secondary I2C slave address is the base address with A(2) asserted */ > bcm590xx->i2c_sec = i2c_new_dummy(i2c_pri->adapter, > i2c_pri->addr | BIT(2)); > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(bcm590xx->i2c_sec)) { > + if (!bcm590xx->i2c_sec) { > dev_err(&i2c_pri->dev, "failed to add secondary I2C device\n"); > return -ENODEV; > } -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html