On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:30 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:54:58 +0200
>
> Some data were printed into a sequence by four separate function calls.
> Print the same data by one function call instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/proc.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c b/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c
> index 07480a9..1047a03 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c
> @@ -142,12 +142,15 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> seq_printf(m, "micromips kernel\t: %s\n",
> (read_c0_config3() & MIPS_CONF3_ISA_OE) ? "yes" : "no");
> }
> - seq_printf(m, "shadow register sets\t: %d\n",
> - cpu_data[n].srsets);
> - seq_printf(m, "kscratch registers\t: %d\n",
> - hweight8(cpu_data[n].kscratch_mask));
> - seq_printf(m, "package\t\t\t: %d\n", cpu_data[n].package);
> - seq_printf(m, "core\t\t\t: %d\n", cpu_data[n].core);
> + seq_printf(m,
> + "shadow register sets\t: %d\n"
> + "kscratch registers\t: %d\n"
> + "package\t\t\t: %d\n"
> + "core\t\t\t: %d\n",
> + cpu_data[n].srsets,
> + hweight8(cpu_data[n].kscratch_mask),
> + cpu_data[n].package,
> + cpu_data[n].core);
I think the code is much easier to read with separate seq_printf()s for
each line printed.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
