>> A string which did not contain a data format specification should be put >> into a sequence. > > This is not a correct description of what you are doing. A better > description would be to say: > > "Use seq_put[sc]() instead of seq_printf() since the string does not > contain a data format specifier". Thanks for your suggestion about an other wording. > You should fix this in all the patches. I am curious if a second approach will become acceptable in the near future. > Please also note this is really pointless patch, If you do not like the proposed changes for some subsystems so far, I would appreciate another clarification: * Could you tolerate them for any other software components? * May I continue to inform involved developers about similar change possibilities? > since reading from /proc isn't done in a tight loop, and even if it were, > the use of vsprintf is the tiniest part of the overhead. Thanks for your software development opinion. > It otherwise reduces the text space or the number of lines of code.... Do other system testers and Linux users care a bit more for corresponding chances in improved software efficiency? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
