> How are you going to fix bugs if you only send clean ups? I would prefer an other wording than "only" in your question. I imagine that probabilities and views will matter more for the handling of a software error spectrum. >> How do you think about to discuss corresponding software development >> statistics in more detail? > > I think normal developers should fix 10 bugs or add a few features for > every regression they introduce. Are you looking for compensation possibilities? > I introduced a regression just last week, so that's a normal part of life, Thanks that you could also admit a programming mistake. > but I was at least *trying* to fix a bug when I did it. I am also trying to improve various software. * We have got just different development opinions about the relevance of some changes. Can such a disagreement be a useful source for interesting ideas? * We are used to inform further contributors about results from static source code analysis. These tools can find a bunch of open issues because of the automatic application of special search patterns. The importance of such findings will vary as usual. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
