Re: [PATCH] wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc: Fix size used in dma_free_coherent()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Le 07/10/2016 à 22:58, Christophe JAILLET a écrit :
Size used with 'dma_alloc_coherent()' and 'dma_free_coherent()' should be
consistent.
Here, the size of a pointer is used in dma_alloc... and the size of the
pointed structure is used in dma_free...

This has been spotted with coccinelle, using the following script:
////////////////////
@r@
expression x0, x1, y0, y1, z0, z1, t0, t1, ret;
@@

*   ret = dma_alloc_coherent(x0, y0, z0, t0);
    ...
*   dma_free_coherent(x1, y1, ret, t1);


@script:python@
y0 << r.y0;
y1 << r.y1;

@@
if y1.find(y0) == -1:
 print "WARNING: sizes look different:  '%s'   vs   '%s'" % (y0, y1)
////////////////////

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Untested

I don't think the error is in the dma_free_coherent() calls.

The issue is for me in the dma_alloc_coherent() call. This call is supposed to allocate a table of buffer descriptors, not a table of pointers to BDs.

Later in the code, this is used the following way:

		iowrite16be(bd_status, &priv->rx_bd_base[i].status);

So it is the allocation which should be

	priv->rx_bd_base = dma_alloc_coherent(priv->dev,
				RX_BD_RING_LEN * sizeof(struct qe_bd),
				&priv->dma_rx_bd, GFP_KERNEL);

Christophe

---
 drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c b/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
index 5fbf83d5aa57..65647533b401 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
@@ -295,11 +295,11 @@ static int uhdlc_init(struct ucc_hdlc_private *priv)
 	qe_muram_free(priv->ucc_pram_offset);
 free_tx_bd:
 	dma_free_coherent(priv->dev,
-			  TX_BD_RING_LEN * sizeof(struct qe_bd),
+			  TX_BD_RING_LEN * sizeof(struct qe_bd *),
 			  priv->tx_bd_base, priv->dma_tx_bd);
 free_rx_bd:
 	dma_free_coherent(priv->dev,
-			  RX_BD_RING_LEN * sizeof(struct qe_bd),
+			  RX_BD_RING_LEN * sizeof(struct qe_bd *),
 			  priv->rx_bd_base, priv->dma_rx_bd);
 free_uccf:
 	ucc_fast_free(priv->uccf);
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static void uhdlc_memclean(struct ucc_hdlc_private *priv)

 	if (priv->rx_bd_base) {
 		dma_free_coherent(priv->dev,
-				  RX_BD_RING_LEN * sizeof(struct qe_bd),
+				  RX_BD_RING_LEN * sizeof(struct qe_bd *),
 				  priv->rx_bd_base, priv->dma_rx_bd);

 		priv->rx_bd_base = NULL;
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static void uhdlc_memclean(struct ucc_hdlc_private *priv)

 	if (priv->tx_bd_base) {
 		dma_free_coherent(priv->dev,
-				  TX_BD_RING_LEN * sizeof(struct qe_bd),
+				  TX_BD_RING_LEN * sizeof(struct qe_bd *),
 				  priv->tx_bd_base, priv->dma_tx_bd);

 		priv->tx_bd_base = NULL;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux